• Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
The Significant Deals
Editor's Pick

Explainer-How Musk’s interview with German AfD leader squares with EU laws

by January 9, 2025
written by January 9, 2025

By Supantha Mukherjee and Philip Blenkinsop

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) – Elon Musk’s expected hosting of Alice Weidel, leader of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, for a discussion on his X platform on Thursday was being watched by the European Commission to check for any spreading of misinformation before next month’s German election.

The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) is intended to address illegal content such as hate speech and intentional manipulation to influence elections.

X has been under investigation under the DSA since 2023 over suspected dissemination of illegal content and the effectiveness of its measures to combat information manipulation.

HOW IS MUSK INVOLVED IN EUROPEAN POLITICS?

Since publicly supporting Donald Trump to become U.S. president last year, Musk has endorsed Britain’s right-wing Reform party as well as the AfD on X.

“The traditional political parties in Germany have utterly failed the people. AfD is the only hope for Germany,” he posted on X last month.

Musk’s endorsement of the AfD, an anti-immigration, anti-Islamic party designated as right-wing-extremist by German security services, has caused consternation in Berlin, where all other parties rule out working with a party they regard as dangerous and undemocratic.

After a Saudi doctor killed five people in a Christmas market last month in the German city of Magdeburg, Musk called German Chancellor Olaf Scholz an “incompetent fool” on X and urged him to resign.

WHAT IS THE EU’S DIGITAL SERVICES ACT?

The DSA regulates big online platforms such as X and Meta (NASDAQ:META) with more than 45 million users per month in the European Union, as well as the app stores of companies such as Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL). Its main goal is to prevent illegal and harmful online activities and the spread of misinformation. 

Musk’s X was the first company to be investigated under DSA for illegal content, in December 2023.

A company can be fined up to 6% of its global annual turnover for breaching the DSA, and up to 5% of daily worldwide turnover for each day of delay in complying with remedies.

If the infringement persists and causes serious harm to users, the Commission can request suspension of the service. 

The Commission has also opened proceedings against Meta and China’s AliExpress, Temu and TikTok. All the cases including that against X are still open except for one against TikTok, closed after the video sharing platform addressed EU concerns. 

WHAT WILL REGULATORS DO ON THURSDAY?

About 150 EU staff are responsible for enforcing the DSA, both at the Commission’s DG CONNECT department in Brussels and the European Centre for Algorithmic Transparency in Spain. 

Former EU industry commissioner Thierry Breton reminded Weidel on X about DSA rules intended to protect democracy around elections.

Senior EU officials acknowledge the challenge presented by Musk but insist the DSA is up to the job.

“Mr Musk is free to express his opinions in the EU online and offline, within legal boundaries,” said Michael McGrath, European commissioner for democracy, justice, the rule of law and consumer protection.

HOW HAS MUSK CLASHED WITH THE EU?

The EU and Musk have clashed several times since he took over his social media platform, then called Twitter.

Before Musk interviewed Trump last August, Breton urged him to comply with EU law as the livestream would be accessible in the EU. X CEO Linda Yaccarino called the letter an “unprecedented attempt to stretch a law intended to apply in Europe to political activities in the US”. 

The EU has accused X of deceiving users with its blue checkmark, which previously indicated that an account had been verified as belonging to a public figure but was changed to designate a paid subscriber.

Musk threatened litigation, and accused the Commission, without providing evidence, of offering X an illegal secret deal to censor speech. Breton denied this.

The commission has also accused X of failing to provide easy access to searchable and reliable information about advertisements, and blocking researchers from accessing its public data.

This post appeared first on investing.com
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Higher bond yields “main risk” to US share prices – BCA Research
next post
UK markets are in the eye of the global bond storm

You may also like

Trump’s Colombia tariffs on hold after Bogota agrees...

March 13, 2026

Analysis-To weather Trump, emerging market investors look to...

March 13, 2026

Fuji Media, rocked by sexual misconduct allegations, says...

March 13, 2026

China central bank conducts 1.7 trln yuan of...

March 13, 2026

European tech shares tumble as China’s AI push...

March 13, 2026

ECB president fears loss of central bank independence

March 13, 2026

Futures slip as investors eye China’s latest AI...

March 13, 2026

How billionaire Caltagirone could influence Italy’s banking M&A...

March 13, 2026

Markets may be repeating the mistake of 2019,...

March 13, 2026

How Italy’s MPS went from near collapse to...

March 13, 2026
Sign up and get the scoop before anyone else—fresh updates, and secret deals, all wrapped up just for you. We're talking juicy tips, fun surprises, and invites to events you actually want to go to. Don’t just watch from the sidelines—jump in and be part of the magic!








    By signing up, you're cool with getting emails from us. Don’t worry — your info stays safe, sound, and strictly confidential. No spam, no funny business. Just the good stuff.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump administration alleges Nike discriminated against white workers

      March 13, 2026
    • Landmark trial accusing social media companies of addicting children to their platforms begins

      March 13, 2026
    • Retail operator of outdoor sportswear pioneer Eddie Bauer files for bankruptcy

      March 13, 2026
    • Cardi B’s cameo in Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show leads to dispute on prediction markets

      March 13, 2026

    Categories

    • Economy (245)
    • Editor's Pick (3,646)
    • Investing (690)
    • Stock (6,426)

    Latest News

    • Trump administration alleges Nike discriminated against white workers
    • Landmark trial accusing social media companies of addicting children to their platforms begins

    Popular News

    • Unilever beats third-quarter underlying sales estimate
    • Earnings call: Vertiv reports strong Q3 performance, raises guidance

    About The Significant deals

    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2026 thesignificantdeals.com | All Rights Reserved

    The Significant Deals
    • Investing
    • Stock
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Economy